Readiness Scorecard

Dental AI Readiness Scorecard

Answer the multiple-choice questions to see your instant AI readiness score and a per-category breakdown. No patient content is requested.

Staff AI Use

Does your practice have a written staff policy for AI tools at work?

No written policy is in place yet Some teams have a shared checklist or draft rules Published, staff-facing policy with escalation steps

Do staff paste patient information into public AI tools?

Often, including identifying details Only de-identified text and only with caution No, we block this behaviour

AI Scribes / Clinical Notes

Are AI scribes being used for treatment notes, intake or recap workflows?

Not using AI scribe workflows yet Planning to use one soon In use with documented controls

How is patient consent and storage for AI transcription handled?

Unclear, no documented process Consent is requested sometimes and storage decisions are mixed Patient consent and storage process are written and enforced

Patient Privacy / APPs / HRIP

Is your privacy policy and staff privacy training current?

No, it is likely outdated or never reviewed Some updates are done, with inconsistent training Current and reviewed by practice leadership

How are online health-form fields and consent currently handled?

Public forms ask for details with weak consent language Some safeguards are present but not fully enforced Clear consent and strict collection controls are in place

AHPRA Advertising

Are claims on your public profile written with compliance-safe wording?

Claims include guarantees, outcomes promises, or 'best in...' language Mostly compliant wording but not consistently reviewed Copy is reviewed and consistently compliant

How are testimonials, reviews and before/after materials managed?

Testimonials and images are posted without governance Some governance, but inconsistent approval Promotional assets are approval-controlled and rights-safe

Treatment-Plan Safety

Are treatment plans drafted in AI workflows?

Yes, auto-generated without mandatory review AI assists but clinician review is inconsistent AI is supported with mandatory clinician sign-off

How are treatment plans shared with patients and third parties?

Plans are shared manually with weak channels Some sharing controls exist but no full workflow Secure channels and version control are in place

Booking & Urgent Capture

What is your current urgent and routine booking path?

Phone/email only with no urgent escalation Online and phone path exists but urgent escalation is informal Clear online and after-hours urgent-capture pathway exists

How are same-day or after-hours enquiries triaged?

No formal triage and no service guarantee Manual triage with some lead-time and coverage Defined response times and after-hours handoff

AI Vendor Governance

Do you maintain an internal AI vendor register?

No register and no defined owner A register exists but is not fully maintained All AI vendors are tracked with owner and review date

How are AI vendors risk-reviewed before use?

No formal security/privacy review process Some checks are done but not consistently Privacy, security, and clinical use checks are done before rollout

Owner Oversight

Who is accountable for AI risk in your practice?

No clear accountability owner Accountability exists but is informal A named owner with routine reporting exists

Do you have an AI roadmap with periodic review?

No documented roadmap Some plans exist, but no formal checkpoints Roadmap, owners and review cadence are in place

Practice name (optional follow-up) Work email (optional follow-up)

Optional follow-up form is only used to save your scorecard result and generate a safer Blueprint request prefill. No free-text patient data is collected.